Understanding the Role of Smell in Fruit Fly Predator Responses
Written on
Chapter 1: Introduction to the Queensland Fruit Fly
The Queensland fruit fly poses a significant threat to Australian agriculture, causing damage worth hundreds of millions annually. Recent research indicates that these flies might alter their behaviors when faced with various predators by utilizing their sense of smell. This discovery could lead to innovative plant protectants.
The investigation, carried out by researchers at Macquarie University and published in Scientific Reports, focused on the Queensland fruit fly, Bactrocera tryoni. The study revealed that these flies exhibit distinct reactions to the scents from four different types of predators.
Lead researcher Vivek Kempraj from Macquarie University's Department of Biological Sciences was motivated to explore this area due to a lack of existing research on the Queensland fruit fly, despite its status as a major agricultural pest causing approximately $300 million in economic losses annually.
“It's surprising that among the 3,000 to 4,000 species of fruit flies worldwide, none have been studied for their interactions with predators. This gap in research compelled me to delve into this topic,” Kempraj stated.
Section 1.1: The Impact of the Queensland Fruit Fly
Native to tropical northern Queensland, the Queensland fruit fly has spread along Australia's eastern coastline due to agricultural expansion, urban development, and transportation.
Kempraj aimed to investigate the fly’s reactions to specific predator scents, including spiders, to potentially create effective plant protectants for what he refers to as “one of the most problematic pests” in Australia. The research examined the fly's responses to four potential predators: three spiders and an ant.
Section 1.2: Selection of Potential Predators
The selected predators for this study were:
- Helpis minitabunda (threatening jumping spider): A light brown spider about 11 mm long, active during the day in northern Queensland.
- Opisthoncus quadratarius: A black, brown-headed jumping spider found in southeastern Australia, also diurnal.
- Clubiona robusta (stout sac spider): A nocturnal brown spider, approximately 13 mm long, distributed throughout Australia.
- Oecophylla smaragdina (green tree ant): An ant that builds nests in fruit trees, active both day and night in tropical Queensland.
These predators were chosen based on their proximity to fruit fly habitats, particularly in areas like Somersby, known for its orange orchards.
Kempraj noted that the green tree ant was included because its related species in Africa has demonstrated a repellent effect on fruit flies. “Flies may sense the presence of ants and avoid trees where they are found, as a precaution against predation,” he explained.
Chapter 2: Diverse Reactions to Predator Scents
The researchers found that the fruit flies exhibited varied responses to the scents of the four potential predators. When exposed to the scents of H. minitabunda and O. smaragdina, both active during the day, the flies increased their speed, either flying or moving away quickly. Conversely, the scent of the nocturnal spider C. robusta caused the flies to slow down, while they showed no response to O. quadratarius.
“H. minitabunda, being a daytime spider, triggered the flies to escape the area. They recognized the threat,” said Kempraj. “In contrast, C. robusta hunts based on vibrations rather than smell, leading the flies to almost freeze in place.”
The absence of a reaction to O. quadratarius was attributed to the flies not having evolved alongside this predator in their native environment. “It was fascinating to see how the flies employed different strategies towards various spiders based on their activity patterns and historical encounters,” noted Kempraj.
The study employed LoliTrack software for movement analysis, revealing that the flies reduced their foraging, egg-laying, and mating behaviors in the presence of different predators. The flies analyzed were ‘naive’ to predators, having been lab-raised for 30 generations without exposure, suggesting that their responses were instinctive rather than learned.
Section 2.1: Implications for Future Research
Kempraj emphasized the need for further studies on the Queensland fruit fly and its predators. “By identifying the right predator, we could discover new chemicals that influence the flies' behavior. This research could lead to agricultural products designed to repel these pests,” he stated.
Additionally, this work could enhance our understanding of the neurological mechanisms behind fear, with implications for human studies. “While the brains of fruit flies differ from humans, there are fundamental similarities that can be explored,” he added.
Kempraj plans to focus on developing products that deter these flies and assist farmers in improving crop yields. “For the past two to three decades, these fruit flies have wreaked havoc in Australia. The government invests billions in controlling them with sterile insect technology, yet significant damage persists. We must innovate new methods and strategies to manage or eradicate these pests.”
The research received funding from the Australian Research Council's Industrial Transformation Training Centre for Fruit Fly Biosecurity Innovation and was supported by the SITplus collaborative fruit fly program.