Advice for Early Career Scientists

For early career researchers, grasping the typical roles and selection criteria for editorial board members is essential. Generally, editorial boards are responsible for (i) assessing the quality of submitted manuscripts and (ii) overseeing the peer review process. Most reputable journals seek individuals with a proven publication history in the relevant subject area. If you have only one or a handful of publications, you may not meet the necessary qualifications for esteemed journals.

The initial evaluation of a submitted manuscript necessitates experience in assessing the research of others. Recently graduated PhD holders often lack the experience required to effectively judge the merits or shortcomings of a paper. Additionally, identifying suitable reviewers demands a broad understanding of the field, which many early career scientists may not possess.

Furthermore, managing the review process includes interpreting reviewers' feedback, which requires familiarity with the research area and experience as both an author and reviewer. Without these qualifications, it becomes challenging to assess reviewer comments, guide authors appropriately, and decide whether to recommend revisions, rejection, or acceptance.

Consequently, if a journal invites you as an early career scientist with limited publications to join its editorial board, I suggest declining the invitation. Such a journal likely does not uphold rigorous standards for manuscript evaluation, and your reputation could suffer from involvement.

Instead, focus on advancing your research, acquiring new skills, building your professional network, and working on grant proposals and publications. As you enhance your reputation and publication count, reputable journals may invite you to review submissions. Eventually, respected journals may approach you to join their boards—this is when you should consider accepting.

Advice for Late Career Scientists

For senior researchers, it’s important to thoroughly investigate a journal before agreeing to serve on its editorial board. If you are unfamiliar with the journal or haven't submitted or read its articles, it may be wise to decline the invitation or not respond at all. If you find the journal relevant to your field, take the time to review its editorial policies.

Examine recent papers published in your area of expertise and assess whether they meet your standards for scientific quality. Remember, those represent the best submissions the journal receives. Are you prepared to evaluate submissions of similar or lesser quality? Is this a productive use of your time that will enhance your field knowledge?

Journals often invite seasoned researchers to lend credibility. Consider whether you are comfortable associating your name with the journal. If you are interested but uncertain about the journal's quality, inquire about the service term or the process for withdrawing from the board. Ensure you have a clear exit strategy if you later wish to step down. It’s also vital to have prompt responses to any inquiries and maintain open communication with the journal, especially with the Editor-in-Chief.

Final Thoughts

Serving as an academic editor is a privilege, granted that the journal is reputable. It offers a glimpse into the ongoing scientific discourse in your field; however, it can also be time-consuming depending on the volume of submissions and editorial responsibilities. Given the busy schedules of most scientists, it’s essential to verify that the invitation you receive is from a credible journal, ensuring that your contributions to scholarly publishing are meaningful and beneficial.

For further information on predatory journals, which should be avoided, consult the following resources and your institution's librarians:

• 13. 14. O’Donnell, Understanding Predatory Publishers. University Library, Iowa State University (11 September 2018) http://instr.iastate.libguides.com/predatory/intro