Driving a Volkswagen E-Golf can be both enjoyable and frustrating. While it offers a smooth ride and comfort, the experience is marred by the limitations of electric range. The manufacturer suggests a range of 300 kilometers, but in reality, I often find myself limited to about 200 kilometers in favorable conditions. When temperatures drop, this could plummet to around 150 kilometers, representing a staggering 25% decrease.

This reality showcases the challenges faced by Battery Electric Vehicles (BEVs). Despite improvements in newer models, charging times remain a significant drawback. For those lucky enough to have a home charging port, the process is straightforward; simply plug it in overnight. However, for those living in urban settings without access to dedicated charging facilities, owning a BEV can be quite impractical. Even fast-charging stations offer little entertainment during the lengthy wait times, especially during frigid weather when range issues arise.

Many might wonder why I didn’t opt for a vehicle with a better range. The answer is simple: affordability. Most people cannot afford premium electric cars. Until electric vehicles become accessible to the masses, the positive environmental impact will remain limited. Even in a big city scenario, the challenge of finding a charging station persists, which is a significant concern.

Fortunately, there’s a promising alternative: Hydrogen Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles (HFCEVs). For brevity, I’ll refer to them as Hydrogen Cars or HCs.

How do these fuel cell vehicles operate? While Tesla deserves credit for popularizing electric vehicles and driving the expansion of charging infrastructure, it’s time we consider the hydrogen option. BEVs boast an energy efficiency of 70-90%, while HCs lag behind at 20-35%. However, filling a hydrogen tank takes less than five minutes, much like traditional gasoline or diesel vehicles. If car manufacturers had embraced hydrogen technology earlier, we might have an extensive network of hydrogen stations by now. Recently, Volkswagen announced plans to produce an HC capable of traveling 2000 kilometers on a single tank, marking a significant step forward in this technology.

Despite the promise of HCs, hurdles remain, particularly in terms of cost. Hydrogen remains expensive, and many wouldn’t invest in a hydrogen vehicle if it meant paying significantly more for fuel compared to gasoline or diesel options. If hydrogen adoption increases, prices could eventually drop, but high costs may persist in the interim.

Moreover, the initial investment in fuel cell technology is high. For instance, a Hyundai Nexo starts at around $59,345 in the U.S. This price is steep, especially for a vehicle that might lack accessible refueling stations. Elon Musk has openly criticized hydrogen vehicles as “mind-bogglingly stupid,” suggesting that their success is unlikely. However, other industry leaders, like Toyota’s chairman, see potential in hydrogen fuel cell technology and are committed to its development.

Hydrogen fuel cells may ultimately have a more sustainable future than batteries, not only in the automotive sector but also in broader energy contexts.

Here’s why:

Range: Electric vehicles may reach a physical limit on battery capacity, where adding weight could negate performance gains. In contrast, fuel cells function more like traditional fuel systems, where larger tanks simply provide more range. Hydrogen-powered cargo ships are already demonstrating remarkable efficiency.

Durability: Batteries degrade over time, leading to diminished performance. Replacing them can be costly and inconvenient. Fuel cells may not face the same level of deterioration.

Reduced Lithium Dependency: Lithium extraction comes with significant environmental costs, and reserves are projected to run out by 2080. Hydrogen, the most abundant element in the universe, offers a more sustainable alternative.

Impact on Power Grids: Existing power grids aren’t equipped to handle widespread BEV adoption. A simultaneous charging scenario could overload infrastructure, while transitioning to hydrogen could alleviate these pressures.

Convenience: Refueling a hydrogen vehicle is faster and more practical than charging a BEV. If hydrogen costs decrease, HCs could become a dominant force in transportation, similar to how mobile phones evolved from luxury items to ubiquitous tools.

Hydrogen Production Costs: Currently, most hydrogen is produced through fossil fuel extraction, which isn’t ideal. However, clean methods, such as water electrolysis using solar energy, are being explored. Innovative solutions like bio-hydrogen production could also pave the way for sustainable hydrogen sourcing.

Storage: Renewable energy generation is inconsistent, making storage crucial. Hydrogen can be stored for use at any time, unlike batteries, which are limited by their capacity and sustainability issues.

Safety: The transition away from fossil fuels is vital. Beyond environmental concerns, reliance on fossil fuels has geopolitical implications and health risks. The death toll from air pollution is staggering, far exceeding those from renewable energy sources.

Ultimately, hydrogen's byproduct is primarily water, presenting a cleaner alternative without the waste associated with fossil fuels or nuclear energy. The shift towards hydrogen technology could lead to cleaner cities and vehicles capable of long distances on a single tank, significantly reducing our dependency on fossil fuels.

In conclusion, as the world moves towards a hydrogen future, the potential benefits are immense. Will hydrogen take a central role in our transportation landscape, or will skepticism persist? Your thoughts are welcome.

If you enjoy writing, consider joining me at Mute Cat Manolo, a free weekly newsletter focused on enhancing your creative writing, content writing, and copywriting skills.