Innovative Beyerdynamic MMX 100 Headset: A Game Changer?
Written on
The Evolution of Gaming Headsets
The landscape of gaming headsets transformed dramatically with the introduction of the HyperX Cloud series. Notably, the Cloud II, Cloud Alpha, and their wireless counterparts have gained immense popularity. However, their journey to prominence was complex and intertwined with the design heritage of Beyerdynamic’s studio headphones.
It is important to note that the HyperX Cloud is not an entirely original creation; it is an OEM product, meaning it was manufactured by another company. OEM, or "original equipment manufacturer," refers to businesses that produce branded products for other companies. In this case, the underlying headphone model for the HyperX Cloud is the Takstar Pro 80, which is essentially a replica of Beyerdynamic’s DT770 Pro 80 Ohm model. Takstar’s design mirrored the aluminum fork and headband shape, achieving sound quality that closely resembles the original. Subsequently, a company named Q-Pad licensed this headphone, added a microphone, and marketed it as the Q-Pad QH90. HyperX then acquired the rights, made minor adjustments, and the iconic HyperX Cloud was born.
Thus, the sound quality and industrial design that propelled HyperX into the spotlight can be traced back to Beyerdynamic. It must have been frustrating for this esteemed German audio manufacturer to observe another company flourish in the gaming sector using its design. While Beyerdynamic’s studio headphones are top-notch, they have struggled to gain traction outside of professional and enthusiast circles.
Had I been in their position, witnessing a competitor thrive for over five years with a replica of my design, I would likely be quite displeased. Beyerdynamic has made previous attempts to penetrate the gaming market with its MMX product line (such as the MMX 300), but these efforts merely combined existing studio headphones with professional-grade microphones. While these combinations performed admirably, they typically came with a much higher price tag than the budget-friendly offerings from HyperX.
Introducing the MMX 100 and MMX 150
After years of ceding ground to lower-cost competitors, Beyerdynamic has launched the MMX 100 at $99 and the MMX 150 at $150 (official site here). This new line features a fresh design tailored for contemporary gamers. The core structure of both models is the same: the MMX 100 employs an analog wired 3.5mm connection, while the MMX 150 includes a USB-powered DAC that enhances several additional features.
Both headsets come in black and grey. I opted for the grey version of the MMX 100, as I already possess high-quality audio hardware for my PC and did not require the extra functionalities offered by the pricier model. I do not use affiliate links, and my complete review policy is available here.
Despite the lackluster marketing surrounding this headset, the product itself is exceptional. It stands out as one of the best-sounding gaming headsets in its price range, with a design and build quality that surpasses many competitors. The microphone performance is equally impressive, easily outshining others in the market. The only drawback might be the comfort level, though I do not share the same concerns expressed by numerous other reviewers—more on this shortly.
In terms of sound, the MMX 100 exceeded my expectations. Its sound signature is relatively neutral, leaning towards accuracy more than any offerings from the HyperX lineup. It provides a satisfactory bass response without the overwhelming boom or muddiness often associated with gaming headsets, along with a subtle emphasis that is currently in vogue. The midrange showcases classic Beyerdynamic clarity, making it suitable for various audio types. The treble also reflects Beyerdynamic’s signature style, which may initially come across as somewhat aggressive, yet it lacks the harshness of the DT990.
I find these headphones preferable to the Cloud IIs, and if you seek a “studio accurate” sound under $100 in a gaming headset, I cannot offer a better recommendation. However, they might not be as comfortable for extended use compared to the renowned HyperX models. My experience with the MMX 100 has come after its release, and I have consulted other professional reviews out of curiosity. Typically, I refrain from reading others' assessments before writing my own, but I was intrigued by the widespread commentary about comfort issues related to the shallow ear pads.
After using the headset for over a week, I concur that its comfort is not optimal, but I do not attribute this solely to the padding depth. The ear pads are plush and filled with memory foam, and while the driver walls do not angle away from the ears, they are well-padded. The main issue with comfort stems from the clamping force, which is the tightest I have encountered in a gaming headset.
Photo taken by the author.
The MMX 100 has a clamp reminiscent of a studio headphone. Its headband design is almost a direct derivation from Beyerdynamic’s Pro X studio headphones (stay tuned for my review on those!), designed for a snug fit to maximize passive isolation. Typically, gaming headsets do not have such a tight fit, allowing for prolonged use without discomfort.
My initial three-hour session with the MMX 100 resulted in a slight pinching sensation around my ears that lingered for about twenty minutes. However, after a week of usage, the clamp has loosened slightly, conforming better to my head. While it remains a snug fit, the padding makes it bearable.
This strong clamping force aids in sound isolation and fit stability. The headset remains firmly in place even during vigorous movement, and it effectively isolates external noise—allowing me to enjoy my audio in a bustling coffee shop without distraction.
Build Quality and Microphone Performance
From a build quality perspective, the MMX 100 is outstanding. The adjustment clicks are sturdy and satisfying. The plastic feels robust, and the ear cup forks are solid. Both included cables are braided and feature well-made connectors adorned with the Beyerdynamic logo. The connector that plugs into the headset is uniquely shaped, meaning replacements will likely need to be sourced directly from Beyerdynamic. While the cables are slightly more susceptible to microphonic noise—picking up sounds when they brush against clothing—that is my only complaint regarding build quality.
The microphone matches the speaker quality, providing balanced vocal reproduction. Its only limitation is its ability to filter out background noise, as the capsule is primarily tuned for optimal vocal capture. I recorded a sample for reference.
Photo taken by the author.
On the headset's rear, you will find an analog volume knob and a microphone mute button. The volume knob experiences slight channel imbalance throughout its range, a common issue with many analog headset controls. As a result, I typically leave it fully open and adjust the volume directly on my device. Upgrading to the MMX 150 offers a digital volume wheel controlling the internal DAC and an “awareness mode” that allows you to hear the surroundings.
Overall, I genuinely appreciate this headset, despite its somewhat excessive clamping force. A revised version with larger ear pads and reduced clamping pressure would likely receive better reviews and sales. Nevertheless, I respect the decision to incorporate a studio-level clamp into a gaming product, as it enhances sound fidelity and isolation. If you can overlook the poor marketing and the snug fit, you will discover an outstanding headset.
While I doubt it will dethrone HyperX's long-standing dominance in the similar product market, this effort by Beyerdynamic is quite commendable. It clearly demonstrates that their design team remains more than capable of upholding the company’s esteemed reputation.
Discover the Beyerdynamic MMX 100 headset's features and performance in this in-depth review, showcasing its sound quality and microphone capabilities.
Explore the comparison between the Beyerdynamic MMX 100 and MMX 150 headsets to see how price cuts affect performance and features.